Spoiler Alert: Some People Never Learn

A couple of years ago I blogged about spoilers, and while it was specifically about a TV show it really is about anything in this digital age. And now with the Olympics winding down the issue of “spoilers” has once again rearing its ugly head. I simply don’t understand how people can’t figure out this one easy rule to follow:

If you don’t want to know about an event (TV, sports, book, whatever) don’t go to websites where that event will likely be discussed.

It truly is that easy. You don’t want to know the results of a sporting event that was streamed live but will be shown on TV later, don’t visit ESPN, Yahoo, Facebook, Twitter, or any of those types of places because the information as to who won will likely be found there. You don’t want to know about a movie, going to websites that review and talk about movies seems like a place you should avoid.

I don’t get the arrogance of people who get angry when they go on social media or forums and find out things they didn’t want to know about. How about you show some willpower and don’t go to those sites. It’s different if you stumble into that information in a place where it probably shouldn’t have been, like someone you follow on Twitter that never talks about sports suddenly starts tweeting results. But to actively go to sites that talk about the very thing you’re trying to avoid is stupidity to the Nth degree.

You have a responsibility to avoid information that will spoil the enjoyment of watching an event, movie, or TV show. People don’t have any responsibility to avoid discussing those things, especially in places where discussions of those topics is what usually takes place. It’s one of the reasons I don’t follow on Twitter or “like” on Facebook many TV shows; they talk about those shows seconds after the episodes air. I tend to DVR stuff, so I need to avoid the places that talk about those shows until I get around to watching them.

Spoiler Alert: It’s so easy to do I never have an issue.

Advertisements

The click-bait reviews of Star Wars: The Force Awakens

Note: This post contains massive spoilers from the film Star Wars: The Force Awakens. If you haven’t seen the movie and plan to, it might be best if you didn’t continue reading. Please consider that fair warning.

In case no one noticed, it’s been a long while since I made a post here. It was an intentional absence for a while as a bunch of projects came up all at one time and with little to no free time to blog I put this place on the back burner. Then over the summer I just never bothered to make time to update it. So now that we’ve reached the new year I’ve gotten a little extra time to try to get things rolling again. Unlike last time there won’t be a set schedule, just mostly “actual” random thoughts when I have them.

That being said, after seeing 2015’s most anticipated movie Star Wars: The Force Awakens, I decided it would be a good subject to restart the “Random thoughts of 210Darryl” blog with. Although it contains spoilers from the movie (last chance to turn back) this post isn’t specifically about Star Wars: The Force Awakens. What this post is mostly about is the click-bait postings that have popped up from people nit-picking over the film. You know the blogs, the ones that require a gazillion page loads to get to the end of their posting with them having introduced virtually nothing original nor entirely accurate.

For the record, I really liked Star Wars: The Force Awakens. I thought it was done well, and in the flavor set by the original trilogy. No, it’s not perfect, but it’s certainly better than the prequels and sets the stage very well for the next two movies. And that’s something many people nit-picking don’t seem to want to ignore: there’s going to be two more movies! Some of these so-called “plot holes” will likely be answered in those two films. So why the need for these slide-show style reviews? Well, each one of those is a page view. Every time you flip through one of those click-bait posts you end up giving the site owner tons of page views, increasing their ad revenue.

That’s really why some of these bloggers are nit-picking. They know Star Wars fans that loved the movie are going to click to see what the blogger is saying, so coming up with these little issues generates more page views. You’ll note that sites that don’t generate revenue in that manner (like this one, where I get nothing at all for page views) generally have more positive reviews of the movie. Let’s look at some of the things bloggers are nit-picking over.

We’ll start with Finn. Lots of bloggers saying they don’t get how if Finn worked in sanitation that he would have trained in weaponry and would have been going down to Jakku at the beginning of the movie. The answer is pretty easy: he lied. Finn was a stormtrooper and didn’t really want that information known to a lot of people, especially being surrounded be folks that might not take the news very well. Those same bloggers also ask how he could wield the lightsaber like he did. If one were to pay attention, he really didn’t use it all that well. Stormtroopers are trained with melee weapons, and a lightsaber is essentially a sword, which is exactly how Finn used it.

Moving on to Rey, I’ll bet every single question about her and her Force abilities will be answered in the next two movies. With only one third of the story being told is anything related to her really a plot hole? The only way to answer that is to see all three movies. Anything left unanswered would be a plot hole. For now, they’re just teasers.

There are lots of questions about Kylo Ren, and again, I think most of these will be answered in the next couple of movies. One thing that does seem clear is he doesn’t have a heck of a lot of training with the Force. His lightsaber duels with Finn and Rey mostly prove that. Look back at the lightsaber battles in the prequels between trained users in the force. Ren doesn’t fight like that at all. He generally fights like he’s wielding a sword. That’s why it takes a little bit of effort to beat Finn, and in part why an uninured Rey defeats him.

There is, however, one glaring plot hole that I doubt will be answered in the future movies. After Rey kills Han Solo Chewbacca goes nuts and essentially blows up everything around him, but when they all get back to D’Qar Chewbacca walks right past Leia, and it’s Rey that Leia wordlessly hugs. Now eventually we may learn what the bond between Leia and Rey is, but I can’t fathom a reason why Chewbacca would walk right past Leia.

Too bad I can’t find a way to get that one into a click-bait post.

My top 5 favorite westerns: #2 The Shootist

In a feature here on “Random thoughts of 210Darryl” started weeks ago I’m listing my favorite movies in a few different genres. We started with my top five favorite comedy movies and counted up toward my favorite, Monty Python’s Life of Brian. Now we’re taking a look at my five favorite westerns, and at #3 we had The Good, the Bad and the Ugly. This week it’s John Wayne in The Shootist.

I think if I had first seen this movie when John Wayne was alive it wouldn’t be one of my favorites. It’s because I saw it after he died and I relate the movie to his life and death that it’s one of my favorites. Nevertheless it is still a great story, one of an aging gunfighter finding out he doesn’t have much time left and deciding to die on his own terms. It’s a sad story that doesn’t completely match the novel, but the changes made really help the story along.

While there are gunfights and the like The Shootist is not your classic western type movie. It’s really about a man looking back on his life and then knowing how he’d rather it end. It’s also about hero-worship in a way, and the ending scene with Ron Howard really plays to what the movie is about.

There are better John Wayne movies out there, but when I list my favorites The Shootist always comes out on top for me, and that’s why it’s number two in my countdown.

THE SHOOTIST
Directed by Don Siegel
Produced by M.J. Frankovich and William Self
Screenplay by Miles Hood Swarthout and Scott Hale
Based on The Shootist by Glendon Swarthout
Starring John Wayne, Lauren Bacall, Ron Howard, Harry Morgan, and James Stewart
Music by Elmer Bernstein
Cinematography by Bruce Surtees
Edited by Douglas Stewart
Release date August 20, 1976
Running time 100 minutes
Box office $13,406,138

My top 5 favorite westerns: #3 The Good, the Bad and the Ugly

In a feature here on “Random thoughts of 210Darryl” started a few weeks ago I’m listing my favorite movies in a few different genres. We started with my top five favorite comedy movies and counted up toward my favorite, Monty Python’s Life of Brian. Now we’re taking a look at my five favorite westerns, and at #4 we had The Magnificent Seven. This week Sergio Leone’s The Good, the Bad and the Ugly comes in at #3.

The Good, the Bad and the Ugly is the third film in the “Man with No Name Trilogy”, with A Fistful of Dollars and For a Few Dollars More being the first two to be released. The events in The Good, the Bad and the Ugly take place before what happens in the other two movies, making the last movie in the series really the first movie. In my opinion, it’s the best of the three by a good margin.

The one thing that detracts from The Good, the Bad and the Ugly and most other Spaghetti Western is the voice dubbing is pretty bad. The actors all performed in their native languages and then has voices dubbed to match the language of the country the film was released in. Getting by the bad dubbing was easy for me, but I could see how it could turn others off from the movie.

One of the things I like about the movie is for the first ten minutes or so there is no dialogue. It really does set the tone for the entire movie. Leone does a masterful job of filmmaking in The Good, the Bad and the Ugly and it really is one of the best westerns out there.

THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE UGLY
Directed by Sergio Leone
Produced by Alberto Grimaldi
Screenplay by Age & Scarpelli, Luciano Vincenzoni, Sergio Leone, Sergio Donati (uncredited)
English Version by Mickey Knox
Story by Luciano Vincenzoni & Sergio Leone
Starring Clint Eastwood, Lee Van Cleef, Aldo Giuffre, Mario Brega, and Eli Wallach
Music by Ennio Morricone
Cinematography by Tonino Delli Colli
Edited by Eugenio Alabiso and Nino Baragli
Release date December, 15 1966 (Italy)
Running time 177 minutes
Budget $1.2 million
Box office $25.1 million

My top 5 favorite westerns: #4 The Magnificent Seven

In a feature here on “Random thoughts of 210Darryl” started a few weeks ago I’m listing my favorite movies in a few different genres. We started with my top five favorite comedy movies and counted up toward my favorite, Monty Python’s Life of Brian. Now we’re taking a look at my five favorite westerns, and at #5 we had True Grit. This week it’s #4 with John Sturges’ The Magnificent Seven.

This is one of those movies I don’t understand why people don’t like it. Now granted I haven’t come across many that don’t, but The Magnificent Seven really is one of the better westerns ever made. Yes, it’s a rip-off of Kurosawa’s Seven Samurai, but it’s done so well it does really stand on its own right. It’s basically the perfect western. Good guys in white hats (although not literally), bad guys in black ones. There’s no phony plot twist, and no fake ending to make sure the good guys win. It’s a solid story with an outcome that’s not ordinarily what you’d get from a western.

When I first saw it I was on a Charles Bronson kick, so it was an easy rental back in the day. I’d heard of Yul Brynner but didn’t really know anything about him, but the other selling point was Steve McQueen. I had seen a ton of his movies and really like the action stuff he was in. Although I didn’t know it before watching The Magnificent Seven, I did come to find out Eli Wallach plays a great bad-guy.

I remember watching The Magnificent Seven on a weekday evening (probably was a Tuesday), and I watched it at least three times that night. I was hooked. It’s one of the first movies I ever bought on VHS and then again one of the first on DVD. I don’t buy a ton of Blu-rays, but of I see it I’m probably going to buy it. The Magnificent Seven comes in at #4 in my countdown, but it’s really 1c in a top four that would be 1,1a,1b,1c.

THE MAGNIFICENT SEVEN
Directed by John Sturges
Produced by John Sturges
Written by William Roberts (Walter Newman & Walter Bernstein are uncredited)
Based on Seven Samurai by Akira Kurosawa
Starring Yul Brynner, Eli Wallach, Steve McQueen, Charles Bronson, Robert Vaughn, James Coburn, and Horst Buchholz
Music by Elmer Bernstein
Cinematography by Charles Lang
Edited by Ferris Webster
Release date October 23, 1960
Running time 128 minutes
Budget $2 million
Box office $5 million

My top 5 favorite westerns: #5 True Grit

In a feature here on “Random thoughts of 210Darryl” started a few weeks ago I’m listing my favorite movies in a few different genres. We started with my top five favorite comedy movies and counted up toward my favorite, Monty Python’s Life of Brian. Now we’ll take a look at my five favorite westerns, and #5 we have the movie that won John Wayne his only acting Academy Award in True Grit.

I have no idea why I like this movie so much because in general it isn’t very good. Wayne is hardly at his best here, Kim Darby was a terrible choice to play Mattie, and Glen Campbell is, well, awful. Yet there’s something about this film that draws me to it every time it’s on TV. I just can’t explain it. What funny is True Grit just narrowly made the cut over another Wayne movie, The Sons of Katie Elder, which itself isn’t all that great a movie but is probably better than True Grit in just about every way. But put both on TV and I’d pick True Grit every time.

I did see the 2010 version of the film staring Jeff Bridges as Rooster Cogburn, and while it’s a real good movie and much better represents Charles Portis’ novel, it doesn’t have the same magic for me that Wayne’s 1969 performance does. There’s just something about those 1960s westerns have that just makes them so much better than many of the ones made after. That’s likely why you don’t see many made anymore. Good ones still do reasonably well at the box office, they just don’t make all that many good ones any more.

TRUE GRIT
Directed by Henry Hathaway
Produced by Hal B. Wallis
Written by Marguerite Roberts
Based on True Grit by Charles Portis
Starring John Wayne, Kim Darby, Glen Campbell, Robert Duvall, Jeff Corey, Dennis Hopper, Strother Martin, and John Fiedler
Music by Elmer Bernstein
Cinematography by Lucien Ballard
Edited by Warren Low
Release date June 11, 1969
Running time 128 minutes
Budget unknown
Box office $31,132,592

My top 5 favorite comedy movies: #1 Life of Brian

In a weekly feature here on “Random thoughts of 210Darryl” started a few weeks ago I’m listing my favorite movies in a few different genres. We’re starting with my top five favorite comedy movies and counting up toward #1. Two weeks ago at #2 was Ghostbusters, and this week at #1 we have Monty Python’s Life of Brian.

If you were to ask folks what their favorite Monty Python film was the vast majority of people would answer Monty Python and the Holy Grail. Then again, many would be hard pressed to name a different Monty Python movie than that either. But for me Life of Brian is not only the best Monty Python movie it’s also the absolute best comedy movie ever.

It is, as the title says, the story of the life of Brian Cohen, who was born in the stable next door to the one where Jesus was born. From that point on Brain is continuously mistaken for the Messiah, which leads to lots of funny situations. For many Life of Brian is as blasphemist a film as there is, but for myself it’s satire at its best. What’s even funnier is the folks that thing it’s blasphemy miss the point that much of Life of Brian is really about every day life of the time. The addition of thinly veiled modern (for the time the film was made) political issues shows how well the Monty Python crew can mix things up to the point where people are not even realizing what they’re making fun of.

Life of Brian is comedy at its finest, and while it may not have the open laughter as some of the others in my top 5, it is certainly worthy of my #1 ranking.

LIFE OF BRAIN
Directed by Terry Jones
Produced by John Goldstone
Written by Graham Chapman, John Cleese, Terry Gilliam, Eric Idle, Terry Jones, and Michael Palin
Starring Graham Chapman, John Cleese, Terry Gilliam, Eric Idle, Terry Jones, and Michael Palin
Music by Geoffrey Burgon
Cinematography by Peter Biziou
Edited by Julian Doyle
Distributed by Cinema International Corporation
Release date August 17, 1979
Running time 93 minutes
Budget $4 million (US)
Box office $20,045,115 (US)